Customer testimonial video production (2 sources)

Every row is a verbatim sentence read from the named source's own page through our fetch service on the date shown, hash-pinned to the stored read (the sha of the page's visible text; the raw page is mirrored to R2).

4 of the 24 named sources that could be read published a usable figure; 20 published none and are recorded as not published, never filled in; 2 could not be read (blocked, dead or unreachable) and count nowhere.

The headline figures (median, minimum, maximum, quartiles) are over ONE figure per source in USD (a source's median where its page yielded several accepted sentences), so N counts sources, never sentences; 166 candidate sentence(s) were refused by a reviewer with the reason recorded.

The fuller derivation this dataset is chartered to grow into (not yet what the figures above are; they are each source's own published figure as read): the published price per finished testimonial video per producer, normalised to one subject and one deliverable, with its currency and country; the remote-versus-on-site spread (the producers who publish both are the only honest read of the '60-80% less' claim everyone repeats); the per-video cost of a batched shoot day against a single; the DIY floor from the software index, so the buyer sees the whole ladder from a $0 self-serve tool to a $20,000 crew on one axis; and the share of producers who publish any price at all, which on the first read is the finding.

166 candidate sentences on these pages were refused by a reviewer; each refusal and its reason is recorded in the review ledger.